#Debate

from typing import Literal

from agents import Agent, Runner
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field


class Review(BaseModel):
    verdict: Literal["accept", "revise", "reject"]
    issues: list[str] = Field(max_length=5)
    evidence_needed: list[str] = Field(max_length=5)


class Decision(BaseModel):
    verdict: Literal["accept", "revise", "reject"]
    reasons: list[str]


fact_reviewer = Agent(
    name="fact_reviewer",
    instructions="只检查事实是否有输入证据支持；没有证据就要求 revise。",
    output_type=Review,
)
risk_reviewer = Agent(
    name="risk_reviewer",
    instructions="只检查权限、副作用、隐私和不可逆风险。",
    output_type=Review,
)
judge = Agent(
    name="judge",
    instructions=(
        "根据原方案和两份结构化审查裁决。不能以多数票覆盖明确安全风险；"
        "任一 reviewer 指出高影响未审批动作时至少 revise。"
    ),
    output_type=Decision,
)


proposal = "Agent 找到重复订单后直接执行退款，并把完整日志发给用户。"
facts = Runner.run_sync(fact_reviewer, proposal, max_turns=3).final_output
risks = Runner.run_sync(risk_reviewer, proposal, max_turns=3).final_output
decision = Runner.run_sync(
    judge,
    f"方案：{proposal}\n事实审查：{facts.model_dump()}\n风险审查：{risks.model_dump()}",
    max_turns=3,
).final_output
print(decision.model_dump_json(indent=2))